Z hop speed cura ошибка

When you add your printer it uses the settings in the fdmprinter.def.json file. It then alters some of those settings with your Tevo_tarantula.def.json file which was authored by «TheAssassin» and submitted by «Tevo» for inclusion in Cura.
So initially fdmprinter.def.json loads and one of the sections is «Speed_Z_Hop». Within the «Speed_Z_Hop» section are:
«default_value»: 10,
«minimum_value»: «0»,
«maximum_value»: «machine_max_feedrate_z»,

Then the Tevo_tarantula.def.json file states in the «overrides».
«machine_max_feedrate_z»: { «default_value»: 3 },
So your Max Z speed is 3 but the default «Speed_Z_Hop» is 10 and that immediately violates the «maximum_value» for the setting and so the model won’t slice.

If you have «Printer Settings» installed in the Marketplace, you can change the «Printer Settings | Max Speed Z» to a higher number (greater than 10) or alternatively you can change the «Speed | Z Hop Speed» setting to 3 or less.

The problem I see is that to this point no one has bothered to ask the printer what it’s actual Max Feedrate Z is. It is stored in M203 and is the real number that should be considered. M203 is included in the printer’s response to an M503 query. If the printer was delivered with a Max Z Feedrate of 3, then the definition file that Tevo provided should reflect that and change the Speed_Z_Hop default to the Max Z Feedrate.

Yours is not the only printer with this problem.

В Cura 4.3 включаю параметр «Поднятие оси z при откате», Cura при нарезке пишет «Не могу выполнить слайсинг на текущих настройках. Проверьте следующие настройки: Z hop speed». На предыдущей версии Cura тоже самое Может кто сталкивался знает как исправить это.  

Ответы на вопросы

Hey there, I’m a bot and something you said made me think you might be looking for help! click here for our wiki entry on troubleshooting printers. If you still need help be sure to post plenty of information about your printing setup.

Here are a few questions that might be helpful

• What printer are you using?

• What material are you using?

• What speed are you printing at?

• What software are you using to slice the print and control the printer?

• When did the problem start/has it ever worked correctly?

• Does anything cause the behavior to change?

• If posting an image of the problem, include some indication of the orientation it printed at, preferably photograph it on the bed. (Then we can focus on a specific axis)

If you are new to reddit, please read the guidelines on reddiquette, self promotion, and spam.

Also please post a resolution to your problem when you find one so that we know how to help others with your problem!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.

 
So what’s new?
The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.

 
The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because…it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.

 
The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.

 
The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
Curious to see the S7 in action?
We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
Register here for the Webinar

Application Version

5.1

Platform

Windows 10

Printer

Qidi X-Pro

Reproduction steps

1. Default z-hop setting was 10mm/s, shown in red
2. Clicking Slice returns error «Unable to slice with current settings. The following settings have errors: Z Hop Speed.»
3. I checked the printer json, and max Z speed is 5mm/s.
4. Changed Cura Z-hop speed to 5mm/s, setting no longer shows as red.
5. Slice still returns same error.
6. Installed Printer Setting plugin, verified it shows 5mm/s is the max just like the json.
7. Tried again with 0,1,2,3,4,5 mm/s, all same error.
8. Closed Cura, restarted, imported models again, same error.

Actual results

5mm/s seems to be defined correctly as the max z hop speed, but Cura keeps giving that error when slicing no matter what z hop speed is selected. This happens whether z hop is enabled or not. Cannot slice.

Switching to my other printer (Kingroom KP3S), it works fine, so logically it must be a printer setting issue. Where else should I check?

Expected results

Slices.

Thanks!

Checklist of files to include

• Log file
• Project file

Additional information & file uploads

cura.log
xpro cubes.zip
definitions.zip

I printed this Curvy vase from Thingiverse and it came out pretty well on my Chiron.

However, I am not happy with the Z-seam that is very large. When I look at other people’s problems with this, they often seem to have too little filament at the seam, but I have too much. What setting should I change to make it less visible?

• Printer: Anycubic Chiron with Marlin 2.0.7
• Material: PLA
• Slicer: Cura 4.8.0.
• Nozzle: 0.4 mm

All Cura settings are here (except that I lowered printing temperature to 200 ºC while printing).

All files used and some pictures are here.

2021-03-07 Addendum after I made 19 test-prints of a small portion of the vase’s neck. Below are some of my notes:

1. Combing Mode=All is better than Off
2. Speed=60 is worse than 40
3. Retract Before Outer Wall=On is worse than Off
4. Outer Wall Line Width 0.45 to 0.35 gave a Z-seam on the outside with more build-up
5. Inner Wall(s) Line Width 0.45 to 0.35. Some places has less contact between layers, so less appealing and less robust. Also less material use.
6. Outer Wall Wipe Distance 2.0 spread ot the seam (too much), and also made a ditch before the Z-seam (on the outside of the ring).
7. Coasting tripled to Vol=0.588 and Wipe Distance 5.0 is more appealing. Two changes at once make it impossible to know which one helped. 5 mm is not enough to completely wipe.
8. 50% printing speed improved Z-seam and surface smoothness

In the future I will use slower speed for Outer Walls, test Wipe distance=2*Line Width, use Combing (turned Off because of some advice to do so when LIN_ADVANCE is used) and experiment with faster retractions and Z-movement.
Pictures and complete notes are available here.

I printed this Curvy vase from Thingiverse and it came out pretty well on my Chiron.

However, I am not happy with the Z-seam that is very large. When I look at other people’s problems with this, they often seem to have too little filament at the seam, but I have too much. What setting should I change to make it less visible?

• Printer: Anycubic Chiron with Marlin 2.0.7
• Material: PLA
• Slicer: Cura 4.8.0.
• Nozzle: 0.4 mm

All Cura settings are here (except that I lowered printing temperature to 200 ºC while printing).

All files used and some pictures are here.

2021-03-07 Addendum after I made 19 test-prints of a small portion of the vase’s neck. Below are some of my notes:

1. Combing Mode=All is better than Off
2. Speed=60 is worse than 40
3. Retract Before Outer Wall=On is worse than Off
4. Outer Wall Line Width 0.45 to 0.35 gave a Z-seam on the outside with more build-up
5. Inner Wall(s) Line Width 0.45 to 0.35. Some places has less contact between layers, so less appealing and less robust. Also less material use.
6. Outer Wall Wipe Distance 2.0 spread ot the seam (too much), and also made a ditch before the Z-seam (on the outside of the ring).
7. Coasting tripled to Vol=0.588 and Wipe Distance 5.0 is more appealing. Two changes at once make it impossible to know which one helped. 5 mm is not enough to completely wipe.
8. 50% printing speed improved Z-seam and surface smoothness

In the future I will use slower speed for Outer Walls, test Wipe distance=2*Line Width, use Combing (turned Off because of some advice to do so when LIN_ADVANCE is used) and experiment with faster retractions and Z-movement.
Pictures and complete notes are available here.