Есть запрос:
with eq as
(select pe.equipment_id as id,
row_number() over(order by pe.equipment_id) as rn
from metrology.protocol_equipment pe
where pe.protocol_id = :protocol_id
and pe.pr_eq_type = 1)
select (select (select asu_tp_iis_system_id from metrology.v_equipment_info e where e.id = eq.id) from eq where rn = 1) as asu_tp_iis_system_id,
(select (select (select d.short_name from metrology.department d where d.id = e.department_id) from metrology.equipment e where e.id = eq.id) from eq where rn = 1) as department_name,
(select metrology.pkg_equipment.GetEquipmentDocs(eq.id, 1, 0, 1) from eq where rn = 1) as control_doc,
decode(p.dic_control_type_id, 1, 'ïîâåðêè', 2, 'êàëèáðîâêè') as dic_control_type,
decode(p.dic_control_type_id, 1, 'Ïîâåðêà', 2, 'Êàëèáðîâêà') as dic_control_type1,
decode(p.dic_control_type_id, 1, 'ïîâåðêå', 2, 'êàëèáðîâêå') as dic_control_type2,
decode(p.dic_control_type_id, 1, 'Ïîâåðêó âûïîëíèë', 2, 'Êàëèáðîâêó âûïîëíèë') as dic_control_type3,
decode(p.dic_control_type_id, 1, 'ïðèãîäíîñòè ÒC ' , 2, 'ñîîòâåòñòâèè äåéñòâèòåëüíûõ çíà÷åíèé ÒC òðåáîâàíèÿì ÍÄ') as dic_control_type4,
case when p.control_type in (1,2,4,5) then 'ïåðâè÷íîé'
when p.control_type = 3 then 'ïåðèîäè÷åñêîé'
else ''
end as control_type,
doc.doc_num,
doc.doc_date,
metrology.utl_system.DateToChar(doc.doc_date) as doc_date_char,
p.metrology_user_id,
(select metrology.pkg_dics.GetCompanyName('long') from dual) as long_company_name,
(select metrology.pkg_equipment.GetEquipmentDocsCode(eq.id, 1, 0, 1) from eq where rn = 1) as control_doc_code
from metrology.protocol p
join metrology.doc on doc.id = p.doc_id
where p.doc_id = :protocol_id
И в данной строке:
(select metrology.pkg_equipment.GetEquipmentDocsCode(eq.id, 1, 0, 1)
from eq where rn = 1) as control_doc_code
возникает ошибка:
ORA-00904: недопустимый идентификатор
С чем может быть связана проблема, и может она быть заключена в выполняемой функции?
I am trying to create a Table in Oracle and getting the error : ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
Here is my command. I really can’t see any problem in it. Please help me to identify the error. Thanks.
CREATE TABLE Sale (
CustomerId INT NOT NULL ,
BarCode INT NOT NULL ,
SalesId INT NOT NULL ,
Date DATE NULL ,
CheckOut TINYINT(1) NULL ,
PRIMARY KEY (CustomerId, BarCode, SalesId) ,
CONSTRAINT fk_Customer_has_Product_Customer
FOREIGN KEY (CustomerId )
REFERENCES Customer (CustomerId )
ON DELETE NO ACTION
ON UPDATE NO ACTION,
CONSTRAINT fk_Customer_has_Product_Product1
FOREIGN KEY (BarCode )
REFERENCES Product (BarCode )
ON DELETE NO ACTION
ON UPDATE NO ACTION);
OMG Ponies
324k80 gold badges520 silver badges499 bronze badges
asked Dec 15, 2010 at 16:59
itsaboutcodeitsaboutcode
24.5k45 gold badges109 silver badges156 bronze badges
6
The maximum length for an Oracle identifier is 30 characters. These exceed that, are 32 chars long:
- fk_Customer_has_Product_Customer
- fk_Customer_has_Product_Product1
See Schema Object Naming Rules
answered Dec 15, 2010 at 17:13
Tony AndrewsTony Andrews
129k21 gold badges220 silver badges259 bronze badges
As previously mentioned, change «DATE» to something more descriptive and not reserved. also, it seems TINYINT does not work in a table create so change that to NUMBER(1), as well as Tony’s correct suggestion of reducing the name size (<=30 chrs)
CREATE TABLE Sale
(
CustomerId INT NOT NULL ,
BarCode INT NOT NULL ,
SalesId INT NOT NULL ,
SaleDate DATE NULL , --DATE is reserved, changed to SaleDate
CheckOut number(1) NULL , --tinyint(1) did not work so changed to number(1)
PRIMARY KEY( CustomerId, BarCode, SalesId ) ,
CONSTRAINT fk_SaleCustCusID FOREIGN KEY( CustomerId ) REFERENCES Customer( CustomerId ) ON
DELETE NO ACTION ON
UPDATE NO ACTION,
CONSTRAINT fk_SaleCustBarCode FOREIGN KEY( BarCode ) REFERENCES Product( BarCode ) ON
DELETE NO ACTION ON
UPDATE NO ACTION
);
answered Dec 15, 2010 at 18:00
1
This tutorial will explain what is causing the ORA-00904 error to occur and how to resolve the ORA-00904 invalid identifier error in Oracle.
ORA-00904 is a standard error in the oracle database, especially when trying to do CRUD operations in Oracle.
Hint: CRUD : is a kind of (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE) operations that happens in the any database not only Oracle
ORA-00904 Error Cause
This error always occurs when you try to select or reference an invalid or missing column. And as per Oracle Documented, this error causes an action in short sentences.
"ORA-00904: invalid identifier error"
Cause: Column name in error is either missing or invalid.
Action: Enter a valid column name.
ORA-00904 Solution
To resolve this error, firstly, we have to check whether this column name exists in the table or not by running this query:
SELECT TABLE_NAME
,COLUMN_NAME
,DATA_TYPE
,DATA_LENGTH
,NULLABLE
FROM ALL_TAB_COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'EMPLOYEES'
AND COLUMN_NAME = 'MANAGER_ID';
The output of the above query is:
TABLE_NAME | COLUMN_NAME | DATA_TYPE | DATA_LENGTH | NULLABLE |
---|---|---|---|---|
EMPLOYEES | MANAGER_ID | NUMBER | 22 | Y |
In the above query, we checked the existence of our column “MANAGER_ID” from table “EMPLOYEES”. And as we can see from the output, this column exists; otherwise, this query will not return any data, which means no_data_found.
In case the column exists, we have to make sure that the column name meets the following criteria:
- The column name cannot be a reserved word.
- The column name should start with a letter not a number.
- The column name length should not exceed 30 characters.
- The column name could contains one of the following special characters “$” or “_” or “#”. And if we want to include other special characters in the column name we should enclosed the name by double quotation marks like this “COLUMN*1”
ORA-00904: Invalid Identifier Error occurs due to Using a Reserved Word in Column Name
If we use a reserved word as a column name, the ORA-00904 invalid identifier error will occur.
CREATE TABLE OSK_TEST
(
"COLUMNlelandkrome119" VARCHAR2 (150)
,"COLUMN*2" VARCHAR2 (150)
,LEVEL VARCHAR2(50)
);
Output:
Error report - ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
In the above example, the ORA-00904: invalid identifier will occur because we use LEVEL as the third column name, a reserved word in the Oracle database; hence, we can’t use reserved words. Fortunately, we don’t have to remember all reserved words while naming any column in our database table.
Hint: You can refer to Oracle documentation of Oracle Database 10g to find the list of reserved words
ORA-00904: Invalid Identifier Error occur While Inserting Data into Table
This error will occur if we use the wrong column name inside the INSERT statement or use a non-existent column. It happens most of the time because of a typo; however, it could be because someone changed the table structure by changing the column name or deleting the column that we are referencing inside the INSERT statement.
INSERT INTO OSK_TEST (COLUMN1, COLUMN2, LEVEL3)
VALUES ('FIRST VALUE', 'SECOND VALUE', 'THIRD VALUE');
Output:
Error report - SQL Error: ORA-00904: "LEVEL3": invalid identifier
We used the non-existence column “LEVEL3” in the above example, so we got this SQL error. We can quickly fix this error by ensuring the column used in the INSERT statements.
ORA-00904: Invalid Identifier Error occur While Select Data from Table
This error will occur if we use the wrong column name inside the SELECT statement or use a non-existent co. Let’s take the below table as an example to execute a select statement against it.
CREATE TABLE OSK_TEST
(
COLUMN_1 VARCHAR2 (150)
,COLUMN_2 VARCHAR2 (150)
);
Now, let’s perform the SELECT statement from this table.
SELECT COLUMN_3 FROM OSK_TEST;
Output:
ORA-00904: "COLUMN_3": invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier" *Cause: *Action: Error at Line: 20 Column: 28
We used the non-existence column “COLUMN_3” in the above example, so we got this SQL error.
ORA-00904: Invalid Identifier Error occur While Deleting Data from Table
This error will occur if we use the wrong column name inside the DELETE statement or use a non-existent column name.
Now, let’s perform the DELETE statement against the table name “OSK_TEST”.
DELETE FROM OSK_TEST
WHERE COLUMN_4 IS NOT NULL;
Output:
Error report - SQL Error: ORA-00904: "COLUMN_4": invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier"
We used the non-existence column “COLUMN_4” in the above example, so we got this SQL error.
ORA-00904: Invalid Identifier Error occur While Updating Data in the Table
If we use the wrong column name inside the UPDATE statement or use a non-existent co, this error will occur.
Now, let’s perform the SELECT statement from this table.
UPDATE OSK_TEST
SET COLUMN_5 = '123'
WHERE COLUMN_2 = 'SECOND_VALUE';
Output:
Error report - SQL Error: ORA-00904: "COLUMN_5": invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier"
We used the non-existence column “COLUMN_5” in the above example, so we got this SQL error.
Conclusion
ORA-06512 is a kind of error that commonly occurs while doing CRUD operations in the database like INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, and QUERY. It might also happen if we tried to use the wrong or non-existent column name in ALTER statement in the database. Here in this article, we have listed the most common causes that cause ORA-00904 errors to occur to help you in the troubleshooting process.
ORA-00904 means that you used an invalid identifier to be a column name, which is most likely unmatched in name or incorrect syntax.
Since most user errors were caused by case-sensitive problem, so we have to explain the differences between loose form and exact form first.
Normally, Oracle treats most identifiers excepts password as case-insensitive ones. But there’re some special usages should be taken care of in case of ORA-00904 invalid identifier.
Loose Form vs Exact Form
According to Oracle Database Object Names and Qualifiers, there’re two kinds of valid naming forms to create a database object. One is non-quoted identifiers, the other is quoted identifiers, both are legal ways to name an object.
Non-quoted Identifiers (Loose Form)
This type of identifiers are not surrounded by punctuation marks or any other special treatments. We can use them case-insensitively and flexibly in SQL statements as long as they are basically equivalent string. For example:
Given String | Recognized As |
---|---|
FIRST_NAME | FIRST_NAME |
First_Name | FIRST_NAME |
first_name | FIRST_NAME |
So I call it Loose Form in this post. In fact, non-quoted identifiers are all regarded as upper-cased ones. This concept will help you to know ORA-00904 better.
Quoted Identifiers (Exact Form)
This type of identifiers begin and end with double quotation marks («»). You can put almost every character in the double quote, including white spaces and reserved words. This kind of identifiers should be used exactly as is originally defined. For example:
Given String | Recognized As |
---|---|
«FIRST_NAME» | FIRST_NAME |
«First_Name» | First_Name |
«First Name» | First Name |
«first_name» | first_name |
So I call it Exact Form in this post. Misusing the two forms is the major source of ORA-00904 as far as I know.
Later on, we will also talk more unqualified issues about ORA-00904 to differentiate quoted from non-quoted identifiers.
Error Patterns of ORA-00904
In most cases, misuse of column names is the main source of ORA-00904, the rest is syntax error. In this post, we will talk about several error patterns of ORA-00904 in the following sections.
- ORA-00904 in SELECT or INSERT
- ORA-00904 in WHERE, ORDER BY or GROUP BY
- ORA-00904 in CREATE TABLE
- ORA-00904 in ALTER TABLE
- ORA-00904 in PL/SQL
- Toad Error ORA-00904: «REF»: invalid identifier
ORA-00904 in SELECT or INSERT Statements
Any columns listed in SELECT or INSERT all have chances to select invalid identifier.
In this section, ORA-00904 alerts users something is wrong, which may be caused by one of the following reasons:
- Non-existent Columns
- Non-existent Functions
- Misspelled Columns
- Case-Sensitive Column
- Blanks in Column Names
ORA-00904 due to Non-existent Columns
Normally, we create a table without using double quotes:
SQL> create table all_names_1 (First_Name varchar2(25), Last_Name varchar2(25));
Table created.
Then we insert some data.
SQL> insert into all_names_1 select distinct first_name, last_name from employees;
107 rows created.
To avoid ORA-00904, you should query this table without any quotation marks. That is to say, column names in either lower or upper case is valid and acceptable. This is because SQL parser will treat all identifiers as upper-cased ones, then qualify each of every column.
SQL> select first_name, last_name from all_names_1 where first_name = 'Ed';
FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME
------------------------- -------------------------
Ed Chen
Using such normally created tables guarantees that it will no longer have ORA-00904 anymore? Let’s see several common types of invalid identifiers.
The first case is to select a column which does not exist in the table.
SQL> select first_name, last_name, num from all_names_1 where first_name = 'Ed';
select first_name, last_name, num from all_names_1 where first_name = 'Ed'
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "NUM": invalid identifier SQL> insert into all_names_1 (first_name, last_name, num) values ('Ed', 'Chen', 100);
insert into all_names_1 (first_name, last_name, num) values ('Ed', 'Chen', 100)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "NUM": invalid identifier
As we know, the column NUM is a wrong column because it does not exist in the table. We’d better to check the definition by describing the table.
SQL> desc all_names_1;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
FIRST_NAME VARCHAR2(25)
LAST_NAME VARCHAR2(25)
If you surprised that the column was missing from the table, it may be removed by someone else.
ORA-00904 due to Non-existent Functions
This pattern is rare though, we should talk about non-existent function calls. Let’s see how we reproduce ORA-00904.
SQL> select first_name, month(hire_date) hire_month from employees where last_name = 'Chen';
select first_name, month(hire_date) hire_month from employees where last_name = 'Chen'
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "MONTH": invalid identifier
SQL parser first tried to match a function named MONTH, but nothing is found, so it turned to match columns, no matched either, SQL parser had no choice but to throw ORA-00904. This reminds me that MySQL does have MONTH function, but Oracle does not. Same reasons for non-existent function: ORA-00904: «DATEDIFF«: invalid identifier.
The solution to ORA-00904 is to call the correct Oracle function named EXTRACT to get month value for your column.
SQL> select first_name, extract(month from hire_date) hire_month from employees where last_name = 'Chen';
FIRST_NAME HIRE_MONTH
-------------------- ----------
Ed 9
Function DATEDIFF does not Work in Oracle
Please note that, some date time functions that you are used to use in MySQL like DATEDIFF, YEAR, MONTH, NOW, SUBSTRING are not valid functions or modifiers in Oracle. You may check Oracle SQL Language Reference : Functions for preventing ORA-00904.
ORA-00904 due to Misspelled Columns
The third case is to select a misspelled and false column name, which is the most common pattern of ORA-00904.
SQL> select first name, last_name from all_names_1 where first_name = 'Ed';
select first name, last_name from all_names_1 where first_name = 'Ed'
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "FIRST": invalid identifier
In the statement, I deliberately invalidated the column name by missing an underscore between FIRST and NAME. As a result, SQL parser translated the statement as this:
To query a column FIRST aliased as NAME and a column LAST_NAME from table ALL_NAMES_1 with rest of conditions.
Of course, there’s no valid column named FIRST, not even First Name. The valid and true identifier is FIRST_NAME. We should check the spelling once again, then correct the identifier.
To avoid typos on column names, you can use a GUI tool like SQL Developer, Toad for Oracle or PL/SQL Developer to facilitate you to autocomplete column names. For an example of SQL Developer:
Autocomplete Column Names in SQL Developer Editor so as to Avoid ORA-00904 invalid identifier
As you can see, we provided some letters and the editor of SQL developer will take care the rest.
Case-Sensitive Columns
In some cases, SQL parser complained about the missing column by throwing ORA-00904, but column exists in the table. How could this happen? All you need to know is that how to use exact form to express columns in SQL statements.
To use exact form of identifiers, we have to use double quotes to wrap column names, which notify the database to create the exact name as we provided. How exactly? At least, we should treat them as case-sensitive identifiers.
SQL> create table all_names_2 ("First_Name" varchar2(25), "Last_Name" varchar2(25));
Table created.
Then we insert some data.
SQL> insert into all_names_2 select distinct first_name, last_name from employees;
107 rows created.
From now on, we can no longer use the table loosely like the old days. Otherwise, we have great chances to use incorrect identifiers in statements and get ORA-00904 thereafter.
Without adding double quotes on columns, we got ORA-00904.
SQL> select First_Name, Last_Name from all_names_2 where First_Name = 'Ed';
select First_Name, Last_Name from all_names_2 where First_Name = 'Ed'
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "FIRST_NAME": invalid identifier SQL> insert into all_names_2 (First_Name, Last_Name) values ('Ed', 'Chen');
insert into all_names_2 (First_Name, Last_Name) values ('Ed', 'Chen')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "LAST_NAME": invalid identifier
Even though the column names are apparently the same as their definition, we still got ORA-00904 due to missing doubles quotes on columns. This is because non-quoted identifier First_Name is loosely recognized as FIRST_NAME, an upper-cased one. Therefore, SQL parser cannot find a matched identifier in the table. Eventually, it raised ORA-00904 to alert the false column.
That is to say, they are literally not the same.
ORA-00904 Invalid Identifier — Oracle Database Object Name Recognition Examples
Solution
The cure is simple, we should quote them exactly as we provided at the table creation, instead of non-quoted form.
SQL> select "First_Name", "Last_Name" from all_names_2 where "First_Name" = 'Ed';
First_Name Last_Name
------------------------- -------------------------
Ed Chen
SQL> insert into all_names_2 ("First_Name", "Last_Name") values ('Ed', 'Chen');
1 row created.
We used the exact form to make statements valid. As we can see, using exact form is very inconvenient, we should take care of every tiny detail on identifiers to prevent them from being invalidated.
Blanks in Column Names
It’s worth noting that the exact form allows us to create columns filled with blanks, which are valid without ORA-00904 invalidation problem. Let’s see a normal table first.
SQL> create table all_names_3 (First_Name varchar2(25), Last_Name varchar2(25), Num int, Create_Date date default sysdate);
Table created.
SQL> insert into all_names_3 (first_name, last_name, num) select first_name, last_name, count(*) from employees group by first_name, last_name;
107 rows created.
SQL> select first_name, last_name, num, create_date from all_names_3 where first_name = 'Ed';
FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME NUM CREATE_DA
------------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ---------
Ed Chen 1 12-MAR-19
Next, let’s see an odd but valid case with blanks in column names.
SQL> create table all_names_4 ("First_Name" varchar2(25), "Last_Name" varchar2(25), " " int, " " date default sysdate);
Table created.
SQL> insert into all_names_4 ("First_Name", "Last_Name", " ") select first_name, last_name, count(*) from employees group by first_name, last_name;
107 rows created.
SQL> select "First_Name", "Last_Name", " ", " " from all_names_4 where "First_Name" = 'Ed';
First_Name Last_Name
------------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ---------
Ed Chen 1 12-MAR-19
As we can see, I used one blank space for the third column and two blank spaces for the fourth column, they can work well without ORA-00904 as long as you follow the rule to query the table.
Any name collision or invalidation? No, this is because one blank is different from two blanks within the namespace of the same table, especially when we are using exact form to define the columns.
Even though we did not get any ORA-00904 and invalidation problem as we used the table carefully and properly, the exact-styled naming is really confusing. Try to describe the odd but valid table:
SQL> desc all_names_4;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
First_Name VARCHAR2(25)
Last_Name VARCHAR2(25)
NUMBER(38)
DATE
Consequently, it displays little information on the third and fourth column. For a new member, who has absolutely no idea what’s going on here. Moreover, once ORA-00904 is thrown when querying such an odd table, no one is able to troubleshoot it.
This remind me that I had ever tried to remove a file with empty or blank name in an Unix OS. It took me a long time to fix it.
ORA-00904 in WHERE, ORDER BY or GROUP BY Clauses
Mismatched column problems like non-existent columns, non-existent functions, misspelled columns and case sensitive columns that we have talked above could also happen in WHERE, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause.
In this section, we specifically talk about how we can use column aliases in WHERE or GROUP BY clause.
- Misusing Column Aliases
ORA-00904 due to Misusing Column Aliases
You can use column aliases in ORDER BY clauses like this.
SQL> column did format 9999;
SQL> column eid format 9999;
SQL> select department_id as did, employee_id as eid from employees order by did;
DID EID
----- -----
10 200
20 201
...
However, you can neither use column aliases in WHERE clauses directly:
SQL> select department_id as did, employee_id as eid from employees where did > 50;
select department_id as did, employee_id as eid from employees where did > 50
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "DID": invalid identifier
Nor in GROUP BY clauses:
SQL> select department_id as did, count(employee_id) as cnt from employees group by did;
select department_id as did, count(employee_id) as cnt from employees group by did
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "DID": invalid identifier
We all know what column DID is, but SQL parser don’t. So it unqualified the alias name by throwing ORA-00904 to alert the problem.
Solutions
Of course, you can use real column names to suppress ORA-00904 anytime. The statements would be more stable in this way.
To be able to use column aliases in WHERE clause, you should wrap the query by an outer SELECT.
SQL> select * from (select department_id as did, employee_id as eid from employees) where did > 50;
DID EID
----- -----
90 100
90 101
...
For GROUP BY clauses that want to use column aliases, it’s a little tricky.
SQL> select did, count(eid) cnt from (select department_id as did, employee_id eid from employees) group by did;
DID CNT
----- ----------
100 6
30 6
...
That is to say, if you insist to use column aliases, an outer SELECT is your solution to ORA-00904 in this error pattern, which can regard all of your column aliases as real column names.
There’re more subtle usages on column alias c_alias in some SELECT subclauses, such as search_clause, cycle_clause and order_by_clause.
ORA-00904 in CREATE TABLE Statements
There’re several possible patterns of ORA-00904 in CREATE TABLE statement.
- Misusing Reserved Words
- Mistakenly Added Extra Comma
- Starting with Number
ORA-00904 due to Misusing Reserved Words
Errors like ORA-00904 could happen in all kinds of object creation. Let’s see some wrong types of identifiers to clarify the naming rules.
Using reserved words are wild, everything that involves them may become unpredictable and nasty eventually. You should never use them to name your database objects.
SQL> create table t1 (audit int);
create table t1 (audit int)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
We saw ORA-00904 again, but this time SQL parser can’t tell the column name and left illegal string empty.
If you insist to use them, please use double quotes, the exact form.
SQL> create table t1 ("audit" int);
Table created.
Chances are, your users might create such database objects under totally unconscious situations. This is because their tools automatically complete the rest of the keyword for users.
Pseudocolumn
Not only keywords, pseudo columns like ROWID or ROWNUM cannot be used for any object or column identifier in the database either.
SQL> create table t1 (rowid int);
create table t1 (rowid int)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
An extra comma mistakenly added in the statement makes SQL parser don’t know what to do, let’s take a look some examples:
SQL> create table t1 (c1 number, c2 date,);
create table t1 (c1 number, c2 date,)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier SQL> create table t1 (c1 number,, c2 date);
create table t1 (c1 number,, c2 date)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
As you can see, we have an extra comma in the column list. SQL parser knew there’s nothing or empty after the extra comma, but it eventually left ORA-00904 for you to fix the illegal usage.
As we have talked, defining columns with pure blanks are acceptable and meaningful as long as you use the exact form to create table. But a nothing or empty column is another idea, which is totally nonsense at all. No wonder ORA-00904 was thrown.
To correct the problem, we should remove the extra comma to make the statement work.
SQL> create table t1 (c1 number, c2 date);
Table created.
ORA-00904 due to Starting with Number
How about a table name which starts with a number?
SQL> create table t1 (12345678 int);
create table t1 (12345678 int)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
ORA-00904 warned you that it is illegal here. So I added a letter «c» before the identifier to fix ORA-00904.
SQL> create table t1 (c12345678 int);
Table created.
For any illegal characters being used, ORA-00911 is raised to alert this problem like the following.
SQL> create table $t1 (c12345678 int);
create table $t1 (c12345678 int)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00911: invalid character
In fact, the dollar sign «$» is valid for an identifier, just don’t put it in the beginning of the object name. For more about the restrictions on special characters, you should go for the next rule.
Although ORA-00911 is an illegitimate usage of object naming, it’s not as obvious and specific as ORA-00904. Now let’s take a look at how to use special characters on object naming.
Special Characters
Only $, _, and # are allowed. For column names, ORA-00911 is raised for invalid character of using an unacceptable special character «?».
SQL> create table t1 (c12345678?production int);
create table t1 (c12345678?production int)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00911: invalid character
Instead of ORA-00904, we saw ORA-00911 that notified us that the question mark is an illegal character. So I changed the «?» into «$», «#» or «_» to correct the problem.
Dollar sign
SQL> create table t1 (c12345678$production int);
Table created.
Number sign
SQL> create table t2 (c12345678#production int);
Table created.
Underscore
SQL> create table t3 (c12345678_production int);
Table created.
In practice, using a string for an identifier is pretty normal. Instead of spaces, underscores are often used and recommended for separating meaningful words in a string.
ORA-00904 in ALTER TABLE Statements
Problems like non-existent columns, non-existent functions, misspelled columns and case sensitive columns are also applied here. Therefore, I’d rather talk about some rare cases in this section.
There’s several patterns of ORA-00904 in ALTER TABLE statement.
- ALTER TABLE ADD Column
- ALTER TABLE MODIFY Column
- ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT NOT NULL
ORA-00904 in ALTER TABLE ADD Column
A typical ORA-00904 in ALTER DATABASE ADD column statements is like this:
SQL> alter table t1 add column c2 date;
alter table t1 add column c2 date
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
ORA-00904 specifically positioned at the reserved word COLUMN and told you that it is not a valid identifier. In fact, this is a syntax error. You don’t have to add the reserved word COLUMN in the statement. So we correct it by removing the keyword.
SQL> alter table t1 add c2 date;
Table altered.
Furthermore, you should not use any reserved word in that position right after ADD.
ORA-00904 in ALTER TABLE MODIFY Column
Let’s see a case of ORA-00904 in ALTER DATABASE MODIFY column statements.
SQL> alter table all_names_1 modify (column fname varchar2(30));
alter table all_names_1 modify (column fname varchar2(30))
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
Same reason here, you don’t have to add the reserved word COLUMN in the statement. Please remove it.
After removing the reserved word, we still got ORA-00904 because I used an invalid column name deliberately.
SQL> alter table all_names_1 modify (fname varchar2(30));
alter table all_names_1 modify (fname varchar2(30))
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "FNAME": invalid identifier
The column FNAME is not found in table. The valid column name should be FIRST_NAME.
SQL> alter table all_names_1 modify (first_name varchar2(30));
Table altered.
ORA-00904 in ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT NOT NULL
SQL> create table t1 (c1 number);
Table created.
You can add an UNIQUE constraint on a column in ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT statements like this:
SQL> alter table t1 add constraint c1_unique UNIQUE (c1);
Table altered.
But you cannot add a NOT NULL constraint on a column in the same way.
SQL> alter table t1 add constraint c1_nn NOT NULL (c1);
alter table t1 add constraint c1_nn NOT NULL (c1)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
As you can see, SQL parser threw ORA-00904 to alert the identifier name used in the statement is illegal. In fact, it’s a syntax error.
Why? NOT NULL is a constraint, isn’t it? Of course, NOT NULL is some kind of constraint, but it’d rather be a column attribute and we used it in the wrong way. Let’s treat it as a constraint first.
Solution 1: Regard it as a Constraint
Basically, there’re 4 types of subclauses for constraint clause in Oracle:
- inline_constraint
- out_of_line_constraint
- inline_ref_constraint
- out_of_line_ref_constraint
In the above statement that generated ORA-00904, it’s an out_of_line_constraint clause which does not allow NOT NULL to be used. Instead, you have to use inline_constraint for NOT NULL. That’s why you saw ORA-00904 when adding constraint NOT NULL.
SQL> alter table t1 modify (c1 constraint c1_nn NOT NULL);
Table altered.
Let’s check the constraint name.
SQL> select constraint_name from user_constraints where table_name = 'T1';
CONSTRAINT_NAME
------------------------------
C1_UNIQUE
C1_NN
SQL> alter table t1 drop constraint C1_NN;
Table altered.
Not like other constraints, NOT NULL cannot be a composite (multi-column) constraint, it only serves for its column.
Solution 2: Regard it as a Column Attribute
Strictly speaking, NOT NULL is a column attribute, so you don’t have to treat it like a constraint, even though it can be a constraint.
For example, we can modify a column as NOT NULL like this:
SQL> alter table t1 modify (c1 NOT NULL);
Table altered.
As we can see, I treated it as a column attribute, not any constraint clause is involved. Let’s check the constraint name.
SQL> select constraint_name from user_constraints where table_name = 'T1';
CONSTRAINT_NAME
------------------------------
C1_UNIQUE
SYS_C0011427
Consequently, the database provided a system-generated name for the constraint. Let’s go further to see how we drop the constraint.
SQL> alter table t1 modify (c1 NULL);
Table altered.
SQL> select constraint_name from user_constraints where table_name = 'T1';
CONSTRAINT_NAME
------------------------------
C1_UNIQUE
That is to say, we don’t have to know the constraint name in order to drop it, just revert the attribute. By the way, there’re more syntax that can add or drop NOT NULL constraints easily.
ORA-00904 in PL/SQL Stored Procedures
So far, we have two error patterns of ORA-00904 in PL/SQL.
- Incorrect Order of Variable Declaration in PL/SQL
- Unquoted String
ORA-00904 due to Incorrect Order of Variable Declaration in PL/SQL
Suppose we’d like to use a cursor which involves a variable like this:
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select employee_id from hr.employees where department_id = v_num;
3 v_num number;
4 begin
5 v_num := 110;
6 open c1;
7 end;
8 /
cursor c1 is select employee_id from hr.employees where department_id = v_num;
*
ERROR at line 2:
ORA-06550: line 2, column 75:
PLS-00320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or
malformed
ORA-06550: line 2, column 75:
PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "V_NUM": invalid identifier
ORA-06550: line 2, column 16:
PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
We saw ORA-00904 thrown by PL/SQL engine. In which, ORA-06550 indicated that the identifier at line 2, column 75 was used illegally in the anonymous PL/SQL block.
This error is very obvious, we cannot use variables before we declare them. In other words, we have to declare variables first to prevent from selecting invalid identifier. So I switched line 2 and 3 in places as this:
SQL> declare
2 v_num number;
3 cursor c1 is select employee_id from hr.employees where department_id = v_num;
4 begin
5 v_num := 110;
6 open c1;
7 end;
8 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
ORA-00904 due to Unquoted String
When you use EXECUTE IMMEDIATE in PL/SQL, you might want to know how to quote a string in a statement.
SQL> begin
2 execute immediate 'select nvl(first_name, NO_VALUE) from employees';
3 end;
4 /
begin
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "NO_VALUE": invalid identifier
ORA-06512: at line 2
In the above statement, we’d like to replace all NULL values with NO_VALUE strings by function NVL, but we hesitated to quote the string in the statement which is now also a string. As a result, we got ORA-00904. Now the problem is, how to quote a string in an outer string in order to make it right?
Solution
The answer is, just duplicate every single quotation mark as two single quotation marks to escape a single quotation mark in a string wherever you want to present a string in another string, especially in EXECUTE IMMEDIATE.
SQL> begin
2 execute immediate 'select nvl(first_name, ''NO_VALUE'') from employees';
3 end;
4 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Now the code block is good.
ZeonExpert 0 / 0 / 0 Регистрация: 20.12.2010 Сообщений: 21 |
||||||||||||
1 |
||||||||||||
25.07.2011, 22:09. Показов 79437. Ответов 13 Метки нет (Все метки)
Привет Всем Не могу выполнить запрос.
Делаю запрос, который должен вывести первый ID, начиная с которого сумма нарастающим итогом по столбцу Value превысит 1000.
Ошибка «неверный идентификатор s» Делаю такой запрос:
Правильно ли это?
0 |
Grossmeister Модератор 4206 / 3046 / 581 Регистрация: 21.01.2011 Сообщений: 13,190 |
||||
26.07.2011, 09:14 |
2 |
|||
1. в секции WHERE нельзя ссылаться на алиас из списка SELECT, можно только в ORDER BY. Если очень хочется сослаться, надо делать обертку
2. Делаю запрос, который должен вывести первый ID, начиная с которого сумма нарастающим итогом по столбцу Value превысит 1000.
0 |
3 / 3 / 0 Регистрация: 07.06.2011 Сообщений: 17 |
|
26.07.2011, 15:05 |
3 |
ZeonExpert, а тебе в запросе нужно, чтобы id шли упорядоченно или в соответствии с очередностью записей?
0 |
Модератор 4206 / 3046 / 581 Регистрация: 21.01.2011 Сообщений: 13,190 |
|
26.07.2011, 15:07 |
4 |
или в соответствии с очередностью записей? А это что означает?
0 |
3 / 3 / 0 Регистрация: 07.06.2011 Сообщений: 17 |
|
26.07.2011, 15:10 |
5 |
То, что id не первичный ключ, и записи могут идти в порядке, отличном от порядка id.
0 |
0 / 0 / 0 Регистрация: 20.12.2010 Сообщений: 21 |
|
26.07.2011, 15:16 [ТС] |
6 |
rug1976
0 |
Модератор 4206 / 3046 / 581 Регистрация: 21.01.2011 Сообщений: 13,190 |
|
26.07.2011, 15:21 |
7 |
То, что id не первичный ключ, и записи могут идти в порядке, отличном от порядка id. Если имеется ввиду физическое расположение записей, то оно в общем случае никакого отношения к порядку следования id не имеет. Не зря обычные таблицы имеют еще второе название — heap table.
0 |
3 / 3 / 0 Регистрация: 07.06.2011 Сообщений: 17 |
|
26.07.2011, 15:28 |
8 |
Более того, без ORDER BY порядок вывода вообще никак не гарантируется, независимо от физического порядка строк в таблице Почему?
0 |
Модератор 4206 / 3046 / 581 Регистрация: 21.01.2011 Сообщений: 13,190 |
|
26.07.2011, 15:33 |
9 |
Почему? Потому что алгоритм формирования результата запроса — это внутренняя кухня Oracle, нигде не афишируемая. И вообще в теории реляционных баз нет термина «порядок хранения записей». Это все на усмотрение СУБД. Только ORDER BY заставляет сервер возвращать строки в том порядке, который нужен пользователю
0 |
rug1976 3 / 3 / 0 Регистрация: 07.06.2011 Сообщений: 17 |
||||
26.07.2011, 16:24 |
10 |
|||
rug1976 Судя по тому, что написал Grossmeister, твоя задача лишается смысла в такой постановке. Что тогда значит «первый»? Добавлено через 42 минуты
ZeonExpert, посмотри, может, подойдет такой запрос.
0 |
AmKad 58 / 58 / 1 Регистрация: 19.03.2011 Сообщений: 149 |
||||
26.07.2011, 16:50 |
11 |
|||
ZeonExpert, посмотри, может, подойдет такой запрос. Так считают нарастающую сумму в MS SQL. В Oracle для этого есть возможность задать спецификацию окна аналитической функции.
0 |
3 / 3 / 0 Регистрация: 07.06.2011 Сообщений: 17 |
|
26.07.2011, 16:54 |
12 |
В Oracle для этого есть возможность задать спецификацию окна аналитической функции. Просвети, please, что это значит?
1 |
AmKad 58 / 58 / 1 Регистрация: 19.03.2011 Сообщений: 149 |
||||
26.07.2011, 17:07 |
13 |
|||
0 |
0 / 0 / 0 Регистрация: 20.12.2010 Сообщений: 21 |
|
26.07.2011, 19:22 [ТС] |
14 |
rug1976
0 |